Russian Failed Probe Still in Orbit

This week, it’s time for an update on “the most toxic falling satellite ever.”  As it turns out, the probe is still in orbit, though scientists now have a better idea of where the probe might fall if it is not incinerated by the Earth’s atmosphere upon reentry.  Present calculations indicate that the probe should fall somewhere between the 51st degrees of north and south latitudinal lines.  This encompasses all of Australia.

The probe is still currently orbiting Earth at 30,000 kilometers per hour.  This means that if the calculations about the probe’s predicted landing site are off by just twenty minutes, the probe could land 10,000 km away from the predicted site.

Fortunately, however, scientists have grown more optimistic that the probe will disintegrate upon entry, so there is little cause for concern.  According to Australia’s Spaceinfo.com.au editor Jonathan Nally, “These chemicals are just lethal, very nasty, but we should be safe from them because of the incredible heat of re-entry. After all, this stuff is meant to burn and this probe doesn’t have heat shields.”

It looks like we can all begin to relax after all.

 

Getting Cold Feet about Tobacco Warnings?

On June 21, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services unveiled a series of twenty-seven warning images that were scheduled to appear on all cigarette boxes in September, 2012.

One of the images rejected by the FDA

The words contain predictable catch-phrases, like “Smoking can kill you” and “Cigarettes are addictive.”  However the photos do the real talking.  The images proposed for use on the cartons contained pictures of children being effected by smoke, cancer patients, and even cadavers.  Some of the stronger images were ruled out by the FDA.  Those making the cut can be seen here.

Even though the FDA decided to pass on some of the stronger images, four cigarette companies files suit in August, seeking to prevent the FDA from adding its new warnings to cigarette cartons.  The cigarette companies alleged that the warnings violate their First Amendment rights.  According to Floyd Abrams, an attorney for one of the cigarette companies, “The notion that the government can require those who manufacture a lawful product to emblazon half of its package with pictures and words admittedly drafted to persuade the public not to purchase that product cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny.”

Another image nixed by the FDA

A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction against use of the warning labels.  Since that time, the controversy has exploded.   On November 30th, FDA appealed the judge’s decision.  President Obama even weight in on the issue, noting in a video that the tobacco companies only challenged the use of the warning labels because ”they don’t want to be honest about the consequences.”  Twenty-four attorneys-general backed President Obama by filing amicus curiae in support of the FDA’s appeal.  The attorneys-general alleged that the First Amendment does not preclude the federal government from requiring that “lethal and addictive products carry warning labels that effectively inform consumers of the risks those products entail.”

The outcome of the suit has yet to be determined.

For more on this subject, please refer to the following articles:

 

Study Finds Nearly Ten Percent of Children’s Toys in China Contain Excessive Amounts of Lead

Lead in children’s toys has become a hot topic with parents everywhere.  Because of that, it might seem that this problem would have been remedied by now.  No so in China.  A recent study that was reported today in China Daily indicates that around ten percent of all children’s toys still contain dangerous amounts of lead.

Conducted by Greenpeace, the study was performed by purchasing five hundred items throughout China’s largest cities.  In addition to uncovering large concentrations of lead in a number of toys, the study also revealed that around thirty percent of the toys purchased also had excessively high concentrations of five other metals.  All of the metals found, including lead, can have severe adverse effects on children which may inhibit their physical and cognitive development.

While countries like the United States and Canada have imposed more stringent regulations on these substances in children’s toys, China’s regulatory scheme lags behind.

For more information on this issue, please click here to read the full article.

If you or a loved one has been harmed by the presence of a dangerous substance like lead, please contact us.  You can read about our firm’s experience with toy injuries here.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.