Coke and Pepsi Still Safe, Despite Complaints from Consumer Group

Recently, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) announced that one of its studies revealed unsafe levels of 4-methylimidazole (“4-MI”), the ingredient used to make sodas carmel-colored.  4-MI is used in sodas such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, and Whole Foods’ 365 Cola.

Upon revealing its findings, CSPI asked the FDA to ban 4-MI.  The FDA confirmed that the group’s petition is presently under review, though FDA representatives did not appear overly concerned.  An FDA spokesman indicated that a consumer would have to drink over one thousand cans of soda per day to consume cancerous doses of 4-MI.

CSPI’s petition also pointed out that the levels of 4-MI found in the sodas were beyond the legal limits in California.  Nonetheless, California added 4-MI to its list of carcinogens without supplying any studies linking 4-MI to cancer in humans.  The only study in support of placing the chemical on the list was conducted using mice and rats.

Still though, manufacturers of sodas have requested that their suppliers of the caramel coloring reduce the amounts of 4-MI present just to remain on the safe side.  Diana Garza-Ciarlante, a Coca-Cola representative, indicated that this change was not made because of any actual public health risks.

In a statement, the American Beverage Association defended the beverage manufacturers: “This is nothing more than CSPI scare tactics… In fact, findings of regulatory agencies worldwide … consider caramel coloring safe for use in foods and beverages.”

For more on this story, please click here or here.

 

 

 

US Navy Plays Battleship and Releases Chemicals

Just as we all struggle to find ways to dispose of old cars, the US Navy needed to find a way to dispose of ships that are past their prime.  According to the Associated Press, the Navy’s preferred manner of doing so is by playing real, live battleship.

In 2005, the USS America aircraft carrier, a vessel spanning more than three football fields in length, sank after Navy personnel purposefully fired missiles and bombs at it. The ships now rests about three-hundred nautical miles southeast of Norfolk, Virginia.  In the past twelve years, this procedure has taken place 109 times.  Sixty-four other ships were recycled at approved processing centers.

The USS America

The Navy stated that sinking ships is not only a means of disposal, but also part of important training exercising that allow for first-hand experience with live-fire and studies on the effectiveness of the munitions.  Nonetheless, this practice is at odds with serious environmental concerns.

When the USS America was laid to rest, it took with it around 500 pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a chemical banned by the US in 1979.  In high concentrations, PCBs are believed to increase the risks for certain types of cancers and have adverse effects on pregnant women, fetuses, and newborns.  In addition, other substances, such as lead, asbestos, and mercury are also believed to have been on many ships now resting at the depths of the ocean.

In 1999, the EPA ordered the Navy to document toxic waste on ships more thoroughly.  In exchange, the EPA agreed to exempt the Navy from federal pollution laws that prohibited dumping the ocean.  Despite this, state officials in Florida have spoken out in reaction to spikes in PCB levels in local fish.  There is currently a lawsuit pending against the EPA, alleging failure to safeguard federal waters.

An AP review of naval documents revealed both incomplete records and stark inconsistencies in the disclosures of toxins on ships.  The Sierra Club and another environmental group, Basal Action Network, have also joined the litigation against the EPA.

The Navy is defending its policy, arguing that it would be cost-prohibitive to remove all toxic chemicals from every ship.  Estimates place the price of doing so at between $500,000 and $600,000 per ship.  Naval spokesperson, Christopher Johnson, said, ”Each vessel is put through a rigorous cleaning process that includes the removal, to the maximum extent practicable, of all materials which may degrade the marine environment.”

Despite the costs, opponents of the Navy’s methods maintain that recycling is a better method of disposing of the ships.  Richard Jaross of Brownsville, Texas, said that not only is the current practice bad for the environment, but his business could add jobs if the Navy decided to recycle more ships. According to Jaross, ”The waters of the world aren’t dumping grounds for getting rid of old things. It’s totally irresponsible of our government to use them for target practice.”

Elusive Upstate New York Illness May be Fading

After weeks of speculation as to the cause of the mysterious condition spreading throughout a high school in LeRoy, doctors finally have some good news- at least two of the affected girls are recovering.  According to Dr. Jennifer McVigh of Dent Neurologic Institute, there are also three more girls who seem to be improving as well.

The girls had been receiving a combination of medication and behavioral and psychological treatment.  Dr. McVigh also attributed the fading attention from the national media as a factor contributing to the girls’ recovery.

Despite this, environmental investigations are ongoing.  Both the EPA and Erin Brockovich are continuing to investigate potential environmental concerns.  The EPA plans to remove barrels leftover from the 1970 train derailment, even though there is no conclusive evidence linking them to the girls’ conditions.  Erin Brockovich’s team also has yet to discover any links between environmental causes and the schoolgirls.

For more information on this story, please click here.

Mystery Air Particles May Cause Harm to Your Health

According to the New York Times, approximately 50,000 Americans die each year from heart and lung disease,  triggered by particles smaller than one thirtieth of the diameter of a human hair.

These particles were discovered about twenty years ago.  However recent scientific studies have uncovered a subset of these particles, known as secondary organic aerosols.  According to the results, the particles are actually more dangerous than we thought.  Secondary organic aerosols are slightly larger and consequently more harmful than their predecessors.  These compounds are formed as a result of the interactions between pollutants and natural chemical compounds.

According to Bill Becker of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, if the authors’ analysis is correct, the public is not facing a false sense of security in knowing whether the air they breathe is indeed safe.”

Essentially what this means is that prior governmental pollution control efforts have only been aimed at a part of the problem, and new measures need to be implemented soon.  The EPA recently announced that it is in the process of reassessing the national standards for fine particulates in ambient air quality.  The regulations were last updated in 2006 and have been successful in lowering the amount of airborne fine particulates by twenty-seven percent.

For the full story, please click here to read the article on the New York Times’ website.

Lead in Your Lipstick?

In 2007, the FDA received complaints stemming from a report published by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.  The report raised concerns regarding the lead content in a variety of brands of lipstick sold in the United States.  In response, the FDA tested approximately four hundred brands.  Having done so, the FDA confirmed that while many brands did contain trace amounts of lead, no brand contained unsafe amounts of it. The study measured lead content against California’s standards, which are known to be the strictest in the country.  (California’s standards limit lead content to 5 parts-per-million.)

Then in December 2011, the FDA quietly updated its results.  This time, the new data revealed that some lipsticks did contain lead quantities that were higher than California’s standards.  Maybelline Color Sensation, manufactured by L’Oreal USA, was found to have the highest lead content at 7.19 ppm, and another L’Oreal brand had lead contents of 7.0 ppm.  Ironically, the cheapest lipstick, Wet & Wild Mega Mixers Lip Balm, contained the lowest levels in the study.

However, officials say that the are not as frightening as they may seem.  It is important to note that lead is not an official ingredient in lipstick, but rather an impurity.

Furthermore, lead is ingested in trace amounts every day. EPA standards for the lead content in drinking water is 15 parts-per-billion, and people ingest far more water than lipstick.

Still though, lead can have serious effects, both on adults and children.  Therefore, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (CFC) is asking the FDA to take action in light of its new findings.  In a letter to the FDA, the CFC noted, “lead builds up in the body over time and lead-containing lipstick applied several times a day, every day, can add up to significant exposure levels.”

If you are interested in learning about how your brand of lipstick fared in the study, you can see the results here.

If you believe that you or a loved one is suffering from lead poisoning, please contact our office.  We will provide you with a complementary consultation concerning your legal rights.

To learn more about lead poisoning in lipstick, click here.

Mystery Condition Strikes Upstate New York Schoolgirls

Last fall, a number of teenage girls at LeRoy High School in upstate New York began exhibiting Tourette’s-like symptoms.  The symptoms all began very suddenly.  Students reporting waking up and suddenly experiencing both physical and verbal tics.  Since the initial report, there are now a total of thirteen to fourteen students who have reported experiencing the same symptoms.  All students affected are female, with the exception of one male.  One of the victims posted a video on YouTube, showing her symptoms. You can view that video here.

Predictably, theories attempting to explain the cause of this mysterious outbreak are surfacing from experts in a variety of fields.  Even Erin Brockovitch has launched an investigation.  Brockovitch’s current theory is that the damage has been caused by a train derailment that dumped cyanide and an industrial solvent in the area in 1970.  LeRoy High School, on the other hand, announced in a press release that it has hired its own environmental experts, and no abnormalities around the school have been uncovered.  On Saturday, Brockovitch and her team were turned away from the area, as the school indicated the investigation was interfering with the school’s daily activities.  Kim Cox, the Superintendent, explained,

…we have been working closely for months with numerous medical professionals, the New York State Department of Health, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. All of these agencies and professionals from these agencies have assured us that our school is safe.  There is no evidence of an environmental or infectious cause.

The doctors treated the affected students are in agreement that environmental factors can be ruled out.  In an interview with MSNBC, Dr. Gregory Young of the New York Department of Health agreed.  Dr. Laszlo Mechtler, a neurologist at the DENT Neurologic Institute in Amherst, New York, has treated several of the girls.  His diagnosis is not Tourette’s, but rather a conversion disorder, known more commonly as mass hysteria.

According to Mechtler, mass hysteria is a condition that, at the present time, cannot be fully explained.  Doctors believe that the condition is caused by a physical manifestation of psychological symptoms.  Symptoms associated with mass hysteria include seizures, tingling, numbness, paralysis, and inability to speak.  For a reason that cannot be explained, women seem to suffer from mass hysteria much more frequently than men.

According to the Huffington Post, this is not at all the first instance of mass hysteria ever to occur.  In fact, most of us are probably more familiar with the phenomenon than we thought.  The Salem Witch trials began after several girls began experiencing mysterious outbursts.  Again in Salem, the vast majority of people affected were women.  The significant gender imbalance is a clue that doctors have used to distinguish between poisoning and hysteria.

A similar outbreak was reported in 1789 in a Northern English textile factory.  The Huffington Post reports that the outbreak began with one woman experiencing convulsions after another woman hid a mouse in the first woman’s dress.  A rumor then spread that the convulsions had instead been caused by an imported bag of cotton.  Before long, twenty-one women, two young girls, and one man, all experienced violent convulsions as well.  The factory was forced to shut down to put a stop to the epidemic.  Those treating the patients determined that the victims were “merely nervous.”  Rather than writing prescriptions for medication, victims were instead encouraged to attend a dance.  The next day, victims were remarkably better and able to return to work.

Similar outbreaks have also been noted in a North Carolina school in 2004 and in schools in Taiwan in 2009 and 2010.

For more information on this story, please see any of the following sites below:

If you or a loved one have been injured by a toxic substance, please contact our firm.  We will provide you with a complementary consultation concerning your legal rights.

Remember Flame-Retardant Pajamas? Then Read This.

Nearly forty years ago, flame-retardant pajamas were taken off the market after they were discovered to be the cause of adverse health effects in children.  Today, the same problem has been discovered in relation to many children’s toys.

A recent study conducted by the Washington Toxics Coalition found that sixteen out of twenty baby and children’s products tested contained large amounts of chlorinated Tris.  Products tested included changing pads, bassinets, car seats, and nursing pillows.

According to the Coalition, chlorinated Tris, or TDCCP, is a flame-retardant chemical that is now used in a number of children’s toys.  On one hand, the product is effective in meeting flame-retardant standards, making the products (in a way) safer.  On the other hand, the TDCCP has been known to escape from the products it was applied to and mix in with dust that travels throughout family households.  Therefore, it can land on anything from toys to food.

TDCCP was recently declared a carcinogen in California.  The Consumer Product Safety Commission also concluded that the chemical increases the risk of developing cancer.  Other studies have shown that TDCCP has reduced sperm counts in men, altered hormone levels in women, and caused DNA mutations in animals.

In light of these concerns, Washington lawmakers introduced a bill two days ago, proposing to ban the use of the compound in children’s products in amounts beyond 50 parts per million.  Representative Mary Lou Dickerson of Seattle was adamant that “parents shouldn’t have to be chemists to know whether or not a product is safe for their child.”

If you or a loved one has been injured by exposure to TDCCP or any other dangerous chemical, please visit our firm’s toxic tort site for further information.  You may also contact us by filling out the form below.

For additional information on this topic, please see any of the following websites:

Preventing Cancer- What You Can Do

While most posts on this blog focus on the things that cause illness, we thought it was time to provide some guidance on how one of our biggest fears, cancer, can be avoided.  While most of this advice is predictable, it warrants repetition.  Scientists seem to be discovering that many of these cancer-fighting strategies are not only good for this purpose, but also for living a healthy life in general.

Eat Healthy Foods

While every health website seems to have its own list of foods that are supposed to fight cancer, the American Institute for Cancer Research has adopted a new strategy known as the “New American Plate.”  Rather than focusing on specific foods, the institute recommends that Americans fill their places with two-thirds plant-based foods and no more than one-third animal protein.

If you are interested in learning about specific foods which are thought to combat cancer, you can view WebMD’s slideshow here.

Drink Water

In addition to being good for weight loss, water can also help your body ward off bladder cancer.  Water can dilute potential cancer-causing agents in your body.  Additionally, drinking more water will increase your frequency of urination, lessening the amount of time harmful substances stay in contact with the lining of the bladder.

Exercise and Maintain a Healthy Weight

Exercise is good for more than simply looking thin.  According to the Mayo Clinic, it can also lower the risk of a variety of types of cancers, including breast, prostate, lung, colon, and kidney.  Even though January is almost over, try to keep this New Year’s resolution going for a bit longer this year.

Stop Avoiding Regular Check-Ups

Annual check-ups with a primary care physician may seem like a chore, but preventative medicine is a crucial component to living a long and healthy life.

A Few Final (And Very Obvious) Tips

-Stop smoking.

-Minimize your alcohol intake.

For additional information on what you can do to stay healthy, you can find more information on WebMD’s Cancer Center and on the American Cancer Society’s website.

Is Your Deodorant Linked to Breast Cancer? WebMD says “Probably Not.”

According to WebMD, many consumers have reported receiving e-mails that purported to tell them about the link between their deodorant and an increased risk of breast cancer.  WebMD released an article yesterday in an effort to set the story straight.  According to the article, deodorant is not actually the principle concern- parabens are.  Well, maybe.

Parabens are a group of compounds that have many similarities to estrogen.  They are found in a number of personal care products, including some brands of deodorant, as well as pharmaceutical and cosmetic products.  However, when asked whether parabens have actually been linked to breast cancer, many scientists say the jury is still out.

On one hand, a new study shows that parabens were found in 99% of breast tissue samples taken from women with breast cancer.  Interestingly though, many of these women also indicated they did not use underarm products.  Furthermore, most major brands of deodorant no longer use parabens.

So where does that leave us?  Researchers were also asked if they believed that personal cosmetics were the problem.  Katherine B. Lee, MD, indicated there is no reason to be alarmed at this point. “Although the environmental exposure to parabens as a cause of breast cancer is a possibility, there is no conclusive data thus far to state this as fact.”  Simply put, more research is needed to make a determination one way or the other.

If you are concerned about the potential effects of parabens in the meantime, there are precautions you can take.  Many brands of deodorant and cosmetics are sold paraben-free. You can also check the Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep Database to find out what ingredients are in the products you use everyday.

If you or a loved one has developed cancer from exposure to any dangerous chemical, please contact our firm, and we will respond to you in a timely manner.

 

Smokers May Face Additional Barrier in Job Hunt

If the present state of the economy hasn’t made it difficult enough for job-seekers to find work, the market in central Pennsylvania just got worse for smokers.  The Geisinger Health System made a new year’s resolution not to hire smokers from now on.

As it happens, Geisinger is not the first employer to make this move.  Refusing to hire smokers is actually legal in twenty other states, and this movement dates back to the 1980s.  Companies pioneering similar campaigns included Alaska Airlines, casinos, other medical centers, and police and fire departments.

Aside from the publicity received to pledging not to hire smokers, companies adopting this policy will substantially reduce their healthcare costs and the number of days their employees are absent from work.

Opponents of the corporate non-smoker policy are concerned that the legality of refusing to hire smokers could open the door to discriminating against those who participate in other legal habits.  Others have noted that many smokers are addicted, and quitting is not a simple or easy task.

Despite the twenty states who do not ban discrimination against smokers, there are still twenty-nine states that do in one form or another.

Finally, there is an issue of enforceability.  Some companies, like Geisinger, plan to rely upon an honor system, while others randomly test their employees.

For additional information on this story, please click here.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.